sat suite question viewer
2l+2w≤27
A rectangle has length l and width w. The inequality gives the possible values of l and w for which the perimeter of this rectangle is less than or equal to 27. Which statement is the best interpretation of (l,w)=(8,3) in this context?
Explanation
Choice B is correct. It’s given that a rectangle has length l and width w, and the inequality 2l+2w≤27 gives the possible values of l and w for which the perimeter of this rectangle is less than or equal to 27. To determine the best interpretation of (l,w)=(8,3) in this context, the values can be substituted in the given inequality. Substituting 8 for l and 3 for w in this inequality yields 2(8)+2(3)≤27, which is equivalent to 16+6≤27, or 22≤27. Since this inequality is true, if the rectangle has length 8 and width 3, its perimeter is less than or equal to 27.
Choice A is incorrect. The interpretation of (l,w)=(8,3) implies that the rectangle has length 8 and width 3, not length 3 and width 8.
Choice C is incorrect. The interpretation of (l,w)=(8,3) implies that the rectangle has length 8 and width 3, not length 3 and width 8.
Choice D is incorrect and may result from conceptual or calculation errors.